Arizona Is An Accomplice To Murder

Armed thugs on our streets

Take Two on Donald Trump's 

'Second Amendment' Comments

Inspirational story located at:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/take-two-on-donald-trumps-second-amendment-comments/ar-BBvsbKF?ocid=UP97DHP

A podcast of this story can be heard for FREE HERE

My comment:

Normal people are not concerned about Donald’s use of “2^nd Amendment Remedies” regarding Hillary Clinton. However, Donald did not address his "2nd Amendment remedy" to the general public. The general public are not as crazy as the people Donald Trump was speaking to.

More thugs

Donald Trump addressed his threatening comment to the NRA people. Who are the NRA people? Well, the NRA openly supports murderers, rapists, armed robbers, child molesters, wife beaters and every version of criminal mentality in America. By support, I mean the NRA wants to allow all these criminal elements to get any gun they want. No questions asked or any restrictions, whatsoever.

Not just any gun either. The NRA supports and promotes criminals obtaining military style assault rifles and carry their weapons in public. It seems the NRA would be perfectly happy if every violent criminal in America were riding up and down the street in a pickup waving their assault rifle in the air.

Deviant on the loose

Don’t try to tell me I’m not telling the truth. Forget all the propaganda about your right to own a gun. Forget all the fancy words. In Arizona, we have gun shows where any sleaze ball can obtain any weapon they want, with no questions asked. Marginal people can purchase an automatic assault rifle and the ammunition, with large capacity clips, put the weapon in the trunk of their car, drive to a nearby mall and fifteen minutes later kill dozens of people in the blink of an eye.

Police will eventually take him out but not until many people are dead. Investigators will swarm in, try to figure out who the killer was but won’t be able to ascertain the answer to that question for many days. They will find a receipt for the gun purchase and go back to the gun show in order to talk to the person selling the weapon.

The investigators will find nothing. The seller wrote down a false name. The seller has no idea who the gunman was. A background check was not conducted. The only concern the seller had when he sold the weapon was how many boxes of ammunition he could sell to the buyer.

Probably convicted felons

The NRA will defend the seller to their last breath. Attempts to prevent such a sale happening again will be defeated by politicians bought off by the NRA. The next month, another mass killing can occur. The NRA will take no responsibility for their actions and they will promote more murder in the future with their desire to arm all the deviants in America.

Let's not forget who makes up a significant portion of the NRA's membership. Neo-Nazis, skinheads, white supremacists, male Chauvinist pigs, the KKK, and on and on. Let’s not leave out the militias. Every weekend, militias are in the woods practicing for the day they can kill fellow Americans and overthrow our government.

Considering who makes up a significant portion of their membership, it’s just a matter of time when the US Government declares the NRA a terrorist organization. Each passing year, the NRA becomes increasingly more dangerous to the American people.

It's a lot of fun being a big man

Gone are the days when the NRA was one of the biggest environmental organizations, doing everything it could do to preserve our wilderness areas, in order to protect their hunting grounds. The NRA has gone from protecting our environment to protecting the criminal’s ability to obtain weapons of mass destruction. Wayne Robert LaPierre, Jr. has certainly altered the purpose of the NRA. LaPierre is responsible for a lot of dead people in America who would be alive today if it were not for LaPierre’s meddling.

Terrorists know, all they have to do is come into America normally, drive to Arizona and buy all the weapons they need in order to murder Americans. It's really easy. There are so many people selling guns to any Tom, Dick or Harry in our state they can actually get discounts when buying large quantities of assault rifles.

If someone can’t find an already converted automatic assault rifle, (they might be sold out) there is plenty of instruction manuals at the gun shows telling you how you convert your assault rifle too full automatic. Arizona gun shows have declared open season on Americans and the NRA guarantees nobody will interfere with their desire to arm America’s criminals.

No! Donald Trump wasn't talking to normal Americans. He was talking to millions of sick violent Americans who know exactly what Trump means when he refers to the NRA taking action against Hillary Clinton if she becomes President. Donald Trump issued a call for violence and his clarion song is music to the ears of every deviant in America.

Yea! A Chance to Kill Federal officers!

A major Native American site is being looted. Will Obama risk armed conflict to save it?

Inspirational story located at:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-major-native-american-site-is-being-looted-will-obama-risk-armed-conflict-to-save-it/ar-BBtTzkn?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UP97DHP

My Comment:

The story gets all involved with everyone's rights, everyone's concerns, local control and States Rights. On and on and on. The real story, more powerful than all the minutia is, "Will Obama risk armed conflict to save it"?

In the middle of all the complications regarding the land in question, is the notion there are Americans, who are itching to kill other Americans, just because they want the freedom to destroy the land. Even worse, they don't want the government to protect the land from greedy, selfish people like them.

The issue has become an opportunity for armed conflict. The truth is, most of the gray haired, potbellied thugs complicating the issue, don't live anywhere near the land in question. The issue is less about land management and more about a threat to kill Federal Officers.

The problem Obama introduced is when he allowed armed criminals to point guns at Federal Officers in the past. Not doing anything then, triggers the same problem today. Criminals in the past, threatening armed conflict, got off free of any consequences.

Therefore, criminals today, threatening Americans lives over this land dispute, are safe in the knowledge there will be no consequences. One can only wonder, if these anti-American thugs are willing to sacrifice their lives, for their right to destroy land not belonging to them?

In our cities, if a criminal points a gun at law enforcement, there is a pretty good chance that person will be dead almost instantly. Christ! If you are a twelve-year-old kid with a toy gun, you can get killed and your uniformed killers get off Scott free.

So now we have armed militias threatening Federal Law Enforcement personnel because they want the imaginary right to destroy the land if they feel like it. Kill a few of them the next time they point guns at fellow Americans. They will think twice before threatening law Enforcement in the future.

Cut off the problem now or see the problem get bigger in the future. City cops don't let people wave guns around. The Feds should have the same attitude. 

Gas Leak in Los Angeles Has Residents Looking Warily Toward Flint

Gas Leak in Los Angeles Has Residents Looking Warily Toward Flint

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gas-leak-in-los-angeles-has-residents-looking-warily-toward-flint/ar-BBoC05Y?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UP97DHP

A really bad and unfortunate situation. It has to be frustrating, waiting for something to be done. As I understand it, the health department is trying to kick a private corporations butt to get them to move faster. On the other hand, the problem may be so big neither a corporation or a government can fix the problem right away. Hmmmm! What to do?

The focus of this story is whether people can trust government again. The government didn't cause this problem. A corporation did. So it comes down to a simple choice. Do you trust government to fix the problem or do you trust a corporation to fix it?

Let's see. Government agencies don't operate on as high a profit margin as corporations. If you don't like the way a government does its job, elect new officials. The people are the stockholders. Government is more likely to operate within regulations than a corporation. Wait a minute, I may be wrong. Government officials are now controlled by profit seeking corporations.

Corporations must answer to stock holders, not the people. In order to make more profit, corporations are likely to attempt a skirting of regulations. In all likelihood, as is the case many times, a corporation ignored regulations, installed inadequate safeguards, all for the sake of more profit. That's probably what happened here.

If the general public doesn't like what a corporation does, there are no elections to cure the problem. The public cannot replace corrupt corporate management with an election. The only recourse is for elected officials to make corporate bosses obey regulations and the law.

Just a minute! I may have made an error. If corporations control government officials with bribes and campaign donations and elections cannot solve the problem, we may have a bigger problem than we thought. Do we have a Fascism problem?

So, we have a paradox before us. Corporate propaganda has successfully manipulated Americans, in the last twenty years, to blame everything on Government when in reality government and corporations are one and the same.

In this story everyone is blaming the government, when a corporation is at fault. That's what I call a great propaganda campaign. Separation of Church and State has been somewhat successful although it is being twiddled away slowly but surely. We should establish a principal of "Separation of Corporation and State".

Keeping corporations out of government would be as good for the country as keeping religion out of government. Too much common sense? Fascism has become too dominate? Can’t fight corporations? Sad, really sad!

Obama vetoes attempt to kill clean water rule

Obama vetoes attempt to kill clean water rule

                                By Gary Donovan Snay

From a story located at:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/obama-vetoes-attempt-to-kill-clean-water-rule/ar-BBorLgk?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UP97DHP

My comment:

The notion that it is alright to poison the public's water sources in order to protect someone's land rights or a corporation's profits, clearly exemplifies the opposing views in our political system. One side clearly does not care about other people and the other side does.

Offering the argument that one side is just a bunch of liberals who want big government to interfere with the right of landowners to do as they please, has no standing. Landowners have never been able to do as they please with their land, when it is to the detriment of people not living on their land.

Wars have been fought since the beginning of time over this issue. Selfish, self-centered landowners and businesses claiming they can divert or poison water sources for their own personal pleasure or for the purpose of profit, ultimately lose the argument. However, victory over greed and selfishness often must be paid for by innocent victims not living on the land causing their demise.

There is a very clear difference in political thinking going on in this nation. Hopefully, people will always be in power to prevent harm done by people interested only in their personal gratification. It is the role of government to protect all the people even if it means teaching good manners to those individuals devoid of good manners.

People who do not own the land in question and who will not suffer the consequences of improper resource management, are the most curious of the lot. There are people who do not own the land in question, protecting land owners they don’t know. They will never suffer the consequences if a land owner they don’t know, poisons people, they also don’t know, who are making the loudest noise.

When people claim it is alright to poison or even kill people as long as it isn't them, something else is going on and no amount of logic will sway their view. It’s obvious another agenda is in play and it is probably rooted in just hating our black President. Racial prejudice is one of those maladies guaranteed to defeat all notions of fairness or common sense. If a white Republican President vetoed this bill, many Republicans would be praising him.

You either care about other people or you don't. If you are selfish and greedy, you must be made to have good manners by force of law. Let's hope people like Obama will always be around to make the greedy little children of the world behave themselves.

With Obama In Paris Republicans Move To Kill His Clean Power Plan

With Obama In Paris Republicans Move 

To Kill His Clean Power Plan

By Gary Donovan Snay

From a story located at: http://www.politicususa.com/2015/12/02/obama-paris-republicans-move-kill-clean-power-plan.html

My comment:

     When profit seeking corporations become willing to sacrifice the health of our planet for their own selfish reasons, it's time to nationalize all the utilities. Providing the necessities of life should not be profited from.

      A well run government can provide needed services to its citizens at a lower cost and be more responsible to the planet than corporations with a single goal of higher dividends for its investors. It is government's responsibility to provide for the common good.

     Profiting from the necessities of life is fundamentally wrong and a whole new philosophy regarding the needs of our people and the needs of our planet must be embraced. Seeking profit at any price needs to be addressed and condemned for what it is.